高级Ed内部有篇文章标题 "
租回读回i发现相当有趣和推荐阅读。它关注数个网站,允许学生以减价租书与Netflix不同, 书籍不按时交回时,
切格网站剖面设计中之一同意为租用的每一本书树上树。 Stephanie Lee作者写道:
网站去年开始创收1000万元, 光是去年一月就超过1000万元.切格自发并透过子程序购买书籍
切格和出版商McGraw-Hill之间的联合企业很有趣,我很想知道这些收入分量是什么作者连通前高德文章标题 "
通书时段评语部分俄勒冈大学图书馆员Andrew Bonamici
链接程序they've undertaken with their campus bookstore to try and reduce the cost of textbooks for students. One commenter, ML, offered this opinion: "The single thing that would make the biggest difference in the money that students I know have to spend on books would be a liberalization of copyright law." Based on my own experience, I'm tempted to agree. I often had to buy coursepacks, which were expensive, loosely bound article reprints-the cost of those materials was certainly not due to fine paper or binding. With so many different stakeholders with competing interests, it's hard for me to imagine a single, successful, solution built on compromise.